Mullis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mullis v. State

146 So. 3d 169, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14161, 2014 WL 4437229

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 10, 2014

DocketNo. 1D10-2234

StatusPublished

This text of 146 So. 3d 169 (Mullis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mullis v. State, 146 So. 3d 169, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14161, 2014 WL 4437229 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Lisa Gail Mullís appeals her convictions and sentences for attempted second-degree murder, kidnapping, robbery with a deadly weapon, carjacking, and second-degree arson. Fundamental error in the conviction for attempted second-degree murder occurred when the court instructed the jury that an element of the lesser-included offense of attempted manslaughter by act is the commission of “an act which was intended to cause the death of’ the victim. Williams v. State, 128 So.3d 23 (Fla.2013). Consequently, we reverse the conviction and sentence for attempted second-degree murder and remand for a new trial on that count. We otherwise affirm.

[170]*170AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Lisa Gail Mullís appeals her convictions and sentences for attempted second-degree murder, kidnapping, robbery with a deadly weapon, carjacking, and second-degree arson. Fundamental error in the conviction for attempted second-degree murder occurred when the court instructed the jury that an element of the lesser-included offense of attempted manslaughter by act is the commission of “an act which was intended to cause the death of’ the victim. Williams v. State, 128 So.3d 23 (Fla.2013). Consequently, we reverse the conviction and sentence for attempted second-degree murder and remand for a new trial on that count. We otherwise affirm.

[170]*170AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 So. 3d 169, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 14161, 2014 WL 4437229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullis-v-state-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack