Mullis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mullis v. State

220 So. 2d 387, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6027

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 18, 1969·No. No. K-469·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed [388] to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment hereby appealed is affirmed. See Valassakis v. State (Fla.App.1966), 187 So.2d 74; State v. Jones (Fla.1967), 204 So.2d 515.

WIGGINTON, C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K., J., and MANN, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed [388] to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment hereby appealed is affirmed. See Valassakis v. State (Fla.App.1966), 187 So.2d 74; State v. Jones (Fla.1967), 204 So.2d 515.

WIGGINTON, C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K., J., and MANN, Associate Judge, concur.

Mullis v. State, 220 So. 2d 387, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6027 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

220 So. 2d 387 (Mullis v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related