Mullis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mullis v. State

220 So. 2d 387, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6027

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 18, 1969

DocketNo. K-469

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 220 So. 2d 387 (Mullis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mullis v. State, 220 So. 2d 387, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6027 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed [388]*388to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment hereby appealed is affirmed. See Valassakis v. State (Fla.App.1966), 187 So.2d 74; State v. Jones (Fla.1967), 204 So.2d 515.

WIGGINTON, C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K., J., and MANN, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed [388]*388to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment hereby appealed is affirmed. See Valassakis v. State (Fla.App.1966), 187 So.2d 74; State v. Jones (Fla.1967), 204 So.2d 515.

WIGGINTON, C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K., J., and MANN, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

220 So. 2d 387, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullis-v-state-fladistctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack