Mullis, Sr., Phillip v. Blount County Community Action Agency

2019 TN WC 116
CourtTennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims
DecidedJuly 30, 2019
Docket2018-03-1517
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 TN WC 116 (Mullis, Sr., Phillip v. Blount County Community Action Agency) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mullis, Sr., Phillip v. Blount County Community Action Agency, 2019 TN WC 116 (Tenn. Super. Ct. 2019).

Opinion

FILED Jul 30, 2019 09:18 AM(ET)

TENNESSEE COURT OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS

AT KNOXVILLE

PHILLIP MULLIS SR., ) Docket No. 2018-03-1517 Employee, )

V. )

BLOUNT COUNTY COMMUNITY )

ACTION AGENCY, ) State File No. 90221-2018 Employer, )

And )

PUBLIC ENTITY PARTNERS, ) Carrier. ) Judge Lisa A. Lowe

EXPEDITED HEARING ORDER DENYING BENEFITS

This case came before the Court on Phillip Mullis Sr.’s Request for Expedited Hearing. The issue is whether Mr. Mullis established that he is likely to prevail at a hearing on the merits in proving entitlement to benefits for an alleged work-related hernia.! For the reasons below, the Court finds that Mr. Mullis failed to do so and denies the requested benefits.

History of Claim

Mr. Mullis worked for Blount County Community Action Agency (BCCAA). His duties included delivering meals to the elderly and picking up food from a food bank.

Mr. Mullis testified that on either September 3, 4 or 5, 2018, he felt a sharp pain and heard a “pop” on his left side when he bent over to pick up a box of food. He stated that Lynnda Manville, the Supervisor and Senior Nutrition Director, asked if he was all right, and he replied no. Mr. Mullis also alleged that Ms. Manville witnessed him yell out

' Both the Petition for Benefit for Determination (PBD) and the Dispute Certification Notice (DCN) listed a hernia injury. At the beginning of the hearing, Mr. Mullis confirmed that the issue before the Court was whether he sustained a work-related hernia. However, he later testified that he actually sustained a pinched left femoral artery. Since Mr. Mullis did not include the pinched left femoral artery claim on the PBD or DCN, the Court is unable to address that issue.

1 in pain and co-worker Renee Jennings helped him to his car because of the injury. He testified that he did not return to work until the following Monday.

Mr. Mullis claimed that he had a swollen groin and a hemorrhaged/purple left leg from the work injury. After continuing to work for a month, he asked for time off to see the doctor. Instead of granting his request, BCCAA fired him. He said he “self- diagnosed” himself with a hernia, but a Veteran’s Administration (VA) doctor informed him he might have a pinched femoral artery.

BCCAA claimed Mr. Mullis furnished no medical evidence establishing that he sustained a work-related hernia and failed to provide timely notice of his alleged injury. Specifically, BCCAA alleged that it first learned of Mr. Mullis’s alleged hernia through a letter from the Bureau of Workers’ Compensation on November 27, 2018, requesting it file a Tennessee Employer’s First Report of Work Injury. BCCAA also claimed its time records show that Mr. Mullis worked his full six-hour shifts the two days following the alleged date of injury, and he continued working his regular shifts through September 26 with September 20 as the only exception.

In response to the Bureau’s inquiry, BCCAA’s carrier obtained Mr. Mullis’s recorded statement. In that statement, Mr. Mullis admitted he did not know the date he allegedly became injured but said that it was sometime in September. BCCA provided Ms. Manville’s affidavit, in which she stated that she did not hear Mr. Mullis call out or make any type of exclamation of pain on September 5. She further denied that he told her that he suffered a work injury. Additionally, Ms. Manville stated that she did not tell Mr. Mullis to go home and the time records support her version of the facts over Mr. Mullis’s.

Ms. Manville noted that on September 27, Mr. Mullins called in sick, and on September 28 he asked to work fewer days due to problems with his mother. At that time, Mr. Mullis relayed to Ms. Manville that he had a tentative date of October 12 for right hernia surgery. Ms. Manville indicated she was unable to reach Mr. Mullis at the worksite later on September 28, and he never returned. As a result, BCCAA determined that Mr. Mullis quit.

BCCAA provided an affidavit from co-worker Violet Ross, which stated Mr. Mullis told her on multiple occasions that he had a hernia for several years that needed repair, but he was unable to schedule the surgery. Additionally, Mr. Mullis’s VA records showed he had a right inguinal hernia as far back as April 2011.

Notwithstanding the inconsistencies between Mr. Mullis’s and Ms. Manville’s affidavit testimonies, BCCAA also questioned the alleged incident on the basis that no food products or other goods were unloaded or unpacked on September 5. BCCAA additionally alleged that no deliveries were made on that day or the day before. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

At an expedited hearing, Mr. Mullis must show he would likely prevail at a hearing on the merits. McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015).

For his hernia claim, Mr. Mullis must definitely prove to the satisfaction of the Court that:

(1) There was an injury resulting in hernia or rupture;

(2) The hernia or rupture appeared suddenly;

(3) It was accompanied by pain;

(4) The hernia or rupture immediately followed the accident; and

(5) The hernia or rupture did not exist prior to the accident for which compensation is claimed.

Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-212(a) (2018). The hernia must result from an “injury by accident arising primarily out of and in the course and scope” of Mr. Mullis’s employment. /d. This statutory criterion is “intended to insure that a claimant’s hernia... ‘result{ed] from the accident for which compensation is claimed,’ and not to a past condition which is unrelated to the new injury.” Rhodes v. Careall, Inc., No. W2010- 02192-WC-R3-WC, 2011 Tenn. LEXIS 1157, at *11 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Dec. 20, 2011).

The Court finds Mr. Mullis failed to definitively prove the hernia criteria. First, he failed to provide any medical proof that he sustained a work injury that resulted in a hernia or rupture. Second, Mr. Mullis discussed the fact that his left leg, from groin to toe, turned purple, but he did not testify about an immediate bulge in his groin. Third, Mr. Mullis described pain following an incident at work, but he admitted that he diagnosed himself with a hernia and later believed his pain might have arisen instead from a ruptured femoral artery. Fourth, Mr. Mullis provided no testimony or medical proof that a hernia immediately followed a work injury. Finally, Mr. Mullis’s VA records show he had a right-sided hernia back in 2011. Admittedly Mr. Mullis testified his pain is now in the left side of his groin and leg, but he provided no medical proof that he actually sustained a left-sided hernia.

For these reasons, the Court holds that Mr. Mullis failed to show a likelihood of prevailing at a trial.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED as follows:

1. Mr. Mullis’ claim for his alleged work-related hernia is denied at this time. 2. This case is set for a Status Hearing/Scheduling Hearing on November 18,

2019, at 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time. The parties must call 865-594-0109 to participate in the Scheduling Hearing. Failure to appear by telephone may result in a determination of the issues without the party’s participation.

ENTERED July 30, 2019. LISA A. LOWE, JUDGE Court of Workers’ Compensation Claims APPENDIX Exhibits:

ee Se See

Affidavit of Affidavit of Phillip Mullis

Affidavit of David Buchanan

Affidavit of Lynnda Manville

Affidavit of Charlotte Douglas

Affidavit of Violet Ross

Affidavit of Renee Jennings

Affidavit of Dan Sibley

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 50-6-212
Tennessee § 50-6-212(a)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 TN WC 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullis-sr-phillip-v-blount-county-community-action-agency-tennworkcompcl-2019.