Mullins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mullins v. State

674 So. 2d 887, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5534, 1996 WL 281498

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mullins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 8192 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 29, 1996·No. No. 94-04348·Published

Opinion

RYDER, Judge.

Richard Mullins challenges the trial court’s restitution order imposed in connection with his adjudication of guilt for numerous counts of burglary pursuant to a plea agreement. As a condition of the plea agreement, he agreed to pay restitution. The appellant now disputes the restitution awards to two vie-[888]*888tims. We affirm without discussion the restitution awards orally announced by the judge, but remand for correction of the $3,500.00 awarded to victim Grover in the court’s written order to conform to the court’s oral pronouncement of $2,500.00.

THREADGILL, C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RYDER, Judge.

Richard Mullins challenges the trial court’s restitution order imposed in connection with his adjudication of guilt for numerous counts of burglary pursuant to a plea agreement. As a condition of the plea agreement, he agreed to pay restitution. The appellant now disputes the restitution awards to two vie-[888]*888tims. We affirm without discussion the restitution awards orally announced by the judge, but remand for correction of the $3,500.00 awarded to victim Grover in the court’s written order to conform to the court’s oral pronouncement of $2,500.00.

THREADGILL, C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.

Mullins v. State, 674 So. 2d 887, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5534, 1996 WL 281498 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

674 So. 2d 887 (Mullins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.