Mullins v. State

602 So. 2d 695, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8978, 1992 WL 187248
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 7, 1992
DocketNo. 91-01581
StatusPublished

This text of 602 So. 2d 695 (Mullins v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mullins v. State, 602 So. 2d 695, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8978, 1992 WL 187248 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

The appellant raises two points oh appeal, and we affirm as to the first point. As to the second, we reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with section 39.059(7)(c) and (d), Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990), pursuant to Croskey v. State, 601 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (en banc). Also, on remand, the trial court may impose conditions of probation which reasonably relate to the crimes committed or to the appellant’s rehabilitation. Rodriguez v. State, 378 So.2d 7 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

LEHAN, C.J., and RYDER, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Croskey v. State
601 So. 2d 1326 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Rodriguez v. State
378 So. 2d 7 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
602 So. 2d 695, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 8978, 1992 WL 187248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullins-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.