Mullins v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mullins v. State

298 So. 2d 205, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8868

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mullins v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 327 So. 2d 106 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 6, 1974·No. No. V-193·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an Order denying his motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and sentence for the offense of robbery, the same having been entered pursuant to appellant’s guilty plea.

We have given full consideration to the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. It appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the proceedings below, the Order appealed herein is affirmed.

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and BOYER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of an Order denying his motion to vacate the judgment of conviction and sentence for the offense of robbery, the same having been entered pursuant to appellant’s guilty plea.

We have given full consideration to the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by the parties. It appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the proceedings below, the Order appealed herein is affirmed.

SPECTOR, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and BOYER, JJ., concur.

Mullins v. State, 298 So. 2d 205, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 8868 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

298 So. 2d 205 (Mullins v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.