Mullins v. State ex rel. Pellicer

254 So. 2d 787, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3294
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 24, 1971·No. No. 41636·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for writ of habeas corpus, petitioner attacks, among other things, the constitutionality of Fla.Stat. § 398.22(1) (d) which we hereby deem and hold to be constitutional.

Petitioner’s remaining points are without merit, and the petition for writ of habe-as corpus is, therefore, denied.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mullins v. State ex rel. Pellicer, 254 So. 2d 787, 1971 Fla. LEXIS 3294 (Fla. 1971).

254 So. 2d 787 (Mullins v. State ex rel. Pellicer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Zardon
406 So. 2d 61 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
McClary v. State
282 So. 2d 379 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1972)