Mullins v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Mullins v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

655 P.2d 1100, 61 Or. App. 221, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 4416

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedDecember 29, 1982

DocketWCB No. 80-09638, CA A24162

StatusPublished

This text of 655 P.2d 1100 (Mullins v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mullins v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp., 655 P.2d 1100, 61 Or. App. 221, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 4416 (Or. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Claimant appeals the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the referee’s denial of his claim for aggravation. We reverse.

Claimant suffered an on-the-job injury on December 19, 1978, and an off-the-job injury on July 4, 1980. The successive injuries first produced and then exacerbated a fracture of the tuberosity of the carpal scaphoid in claimant’s right wrist. The referee found that after the initial injury claimant had a fibrous union in the fracture area which made a reinjury more likely. The referee denied the claim with the explanation that the second incident was a material contributing cause of the worsened condition. The referee misapplied the test for determining compensability of subsequent injuries.

There was no evidence to contradict the treating physician’s testimony that claimant had only a fibrous union in the area of the fracture following the initial injury. The bone was not able to take as much stress as a normal one. After the second incident, the fracture was more obvious and the fracture fragment slightly displaced. Claimant’s condition has worsened since the prior determination order. We hold that claimant’s initial on-the-job injury was a material contributing cause of his worsened condition. Grable v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 55 Or App 627, 639 P2d 677 (1982).

Reversed and remanded for entry of an order that the claim be accepted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Claimant appeals the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the referee’s denial of his claim for aggravation. We reverse.

Claimant suffered an on-the-job injury on December 19, 1978, and an off-the-job injury on July 4, 1980. The successive injuries first produced and then exacerbated a fracture of the tuberosity of the carpal scaphoid in claimant’s right wrist. The referee found that after the initial injury claimant had a fibrous union in the fracture area which made a reinjury more likely. The referee denied the claim with the explanation that the second incident was a material contributing cause of the worsened condition. The referee misapplied the test for determining compensability of subsequent injuries.

There was no evidence to contradict the treating physician’s testimony that claimant had only a fibrous union in the area of the fracture following the initial injury. The bone was not able to take as much stress as a normal one. After the second incident, the fracture was more obvious and the fracture fragment slightly displaced. Claimant’s condition has worsened since the prior determination order. We hold that claimant’s initial on-the-job injury was a material contributing cause of his worsened condition. Grable v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 55 Or App 627, 639 P2d 677 (1982).

Reversed and remanded for entry of an order that the claim be accepted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

655 P.2d 1100, 61 Or. App. 221, 1982 Ore. App. LEXIS 4416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullins-v-state-accident-insurance-fund-corp-orctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack