Mullins v. Mullins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mullins v. Mullins

440 S.W.3d 568, 2014 WL 2931931, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 723

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2014·No. No. ED 100095·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jannie Mullins appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding that James Mullins, Jr. is entitled to a credit towards his child-support obligation for the full amount of social-security benefits received by the child. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jannie Mullins appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding that James Mullins, Jr. is entitled to a credit towards his child-support obligation for the full amount of social-security benefits received by the child. An opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

Mullins v. Mullins, 440 S.W.3d 568, 2014 WL 2931931, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 723 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

440 S.W.3d 568 (Mullins v. Mullins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.