Mullins v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 77
This text of 60 F. App'x 510 (Mullins v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 77) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Esther Mullins appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action alleging breach of the duty of fair representation, breach of a collective bargaining agreement, defamation, and wrongful termination. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mullins v. International Union of Operating Eng’rs., 214 F.Supp.2d 655 (E.D.Va. 2002). We grant the motion to file a supplemental appendix and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F. App'x 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullins-v-international-union-of-operating-engineers-local-no-77-ca4-2003.