Mullins v. First General Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mullins v. First General Insurance

326 S.E.2d 241, 173 Ga. App. 252, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 1495

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 9, 1985

Docket68068

StatusPublished

This text of 326 S.E.2d 241 (Mullins v. First General Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mullins v. First General Insurance, 326 S.E.2d 241, 173 Ga. App. 252, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 1495 (Ga. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

We certified the following question to our Supreme Court: “Is the holder of a motor vehicle liability insurance policy in existence prior to November 1, 1982, whose application for insurance did not meet the requirements of OCGA § 33-34-5 (b) in effect prior to November 1, 1982, thereafter barred by the amended OCGA § 33-34-5 (c), which became effective on November 1, 1982, from the ‘right to demand and receive the benefit of $50,000 coverage upon tender by the insured of such additional premium as may be due and filing of proof of loss

The Supreme Court said “no” as to collisions occurring before November 1,1982, and “yes” as to collisions occurring after that date. In so answering, the Supreme Court pointed out: (1) that the purpose of the General Assembly in enacting the 1982 amendment to OCGA § 33-34-5 was to “alter the law in order to bar claims for optional PIP benefits by insureds who held policies existing as of November 1, 1982, which were not in compliance with former OCGA § 33-34-5 (b)”; (2) that, since there was no vested right to optional PIP under former OCGA § 33-34-5, as to one who obtained coverage prior to November 1,1982, but was involved in an automobile “accident” after that date, the 1982 amendment to OCGA § 33-34-5 was applicable. Mullins v. First Gen. Ins. Co., 253 Ga. 486 (322 SE2d 265) (1984).

In this case, Mullins’ policy became effective on October 19,1982, and provided for $5,000 in optional PIP benefits. Mullins was injured in an automobile collision on January 6, 1983, and thereafter sought to accept additional PIP coverage up to $50,000. The insurer declined and Mullins brought an action on the policy, seeking general damages, penalties and attorney fees. Defendant insurer’s motion for summary judgment was granted and Mullins appealed. Held:

We affirm. Under the Supreme Court ruling as applied to the instant facts, Mullins was not entitled to obtain additional PIP coverage since his collision occurred after the effective date of the 1982 amendment to OCGA § 33-34-5.

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong, P. J., Carley and Beasley, JJ., concur. Douglas F. Aholt, amicus curiae.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

We certified the following question to our Supreme Court: “Is the holder of a motor vehicle liability insurance policy in existence prior to November 1, 1982, whose application for insurance did not meet the requirements of OCGA § 33-34-5 (b) in effect prior to November 1, 1982, thereafter barred by the amended OCGA § 33-34-5 (c), which became effective on November 1, 1982, from the ‘right to demand and receive the benefit of $50,000 coverage upon tender by the insured of such additional premium as may be due and filing of proof of loss

The Supreme Court said “no” as to collisions occurring before November 1,1982, and “yes” as to collisions occurring after that date. In so answering, the Supreme Court pointed out: (1) that the purpose of the General Assembly in enacting the 1982 amendment to OCGA § 33-34-5 was to “alter the law in order to bar claims for optional PIP benefits by insureds who held policies existing as of November 1, 1982, which were not in compliance with former OCGA § 33-34-5 (b)”; (2) that, since there was no vested right to optional PIP under former OCGA § 33-34-5, as to one who obtained coverage prior to November 1,1982, but was involved in an automobile “accident” after that date, the 1982 amendment to OCGA § 33-34-5 was applicable. Mullins v. First Gen. Ins. Co., 253 Ga. 486 (322 SE2d 265) (1984).

In this case, Mullins’ policy became effective on October 19,1982, and provided for $5,000 in optional PIP benefits. Mullins was injured in an automobile collision on January 6, 1983, and thereafter sought to accept additional PIP coverage up to $50,000. The insurer declined and Mullins brought an action on the policy, seeking general damages, penalties and attorney fees. Defendant insurer’s motion for summary judgment was granted and Mullins appealed. Held:

We affirm. Under the Supreme Court ruling as applied to the instant facts, Mullins was not entitled to obtain additional PIP coverage since his collision occurred after the effective date of the 1982 amendment to OCGA § 33-34-5.

Judgment affirmed.

Birdsong, P. J., Carley and Beasley, JJ., concur. Douglas F. Aholt, amicus curiae.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

326 S.E.2d 241, 173 Ga. App. 252, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 1495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullins-v-first-general-insurance-gactapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack