Mullins v. Commonwealth
This text of 33 S.E. 1015 (Mullins v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
We are of opinion that the county court erred in permitting certain papers, purporting to be letters from the accused, to be read to the jury, as set out in bills of exceptions Nos. 1 and 2. They are immaterial, irrelevant, and should have been excluded. The evidence is so indecent that we shall not discuss it in detail, but will content ourselves with observing that it is wholly insufficient to maintain the verdict; and for the foregoing reasons the judgment of the county court must be reversed, the verdict of the jury set aside, and the case remanded for a new trial, to be had. therein in accordance with this opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 S.E. 1015, 2 Va. Dec. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullins-v-commonwealth-va-1899.