Mullings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mullings v. State

553 So. 2d 287, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2759, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6608, 1989 WL 142695

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 28, 1989·No. No. 89-2129·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Carl Mullings, appeals from a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, Flor[288]*288ida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the order of the trial court based upon a holding that the motion was untimely filed; and the issues raised therein were procedurally barred and/or without merit. Rose v. State, 472 So.2d 1155 (Fla.1985); Zeigler v. State, 452 So.2d 537 (Fla.1984); Brown v. State, 430 So.2d 446 (Fla.1983); Ford v. State, 407 So.2d 907 (Fla.1981); Ponder v. State, 530 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Paez v. State, 512 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Williams v. State, 473 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Carl Mullings, appeals from a trial court order denying his motion for post-conviction relief under rule 3.850, Flor[288]*288ida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We affirm the order of the trial court based upon a holding that the motion was untimely filed; and the issues raised therein were procedurally barred and/or without merit. Rose v. State, 472 So.2d 1155 (Fla.1985); Zeigler v. State, 452 So.2d 537 (Fla.1984); Brown v. State, 430 So.2d 446 (Fla.1983); Ford v. State, 407 So.2d 907 (Fla.1981); Ponder v. State, 530 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Paez v. State, 512 So.2d 263 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Williams v. State, 473 So.2d 11 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Mullings v. State, 553 So. 2d 287, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2759, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6608, 1989 WL 142695 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

553 So. 2d 287 (Mullings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related