Mullinax v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Mullinax v. State

79 So. 143, 16 Ala. App. 469, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 153

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 29, 1918

Docket7 Div. 539.

StatusPublished

This text of 79 So. 143 (Mullinax v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mullinax v. State, 79 So. 143, 16 Ala. App. 469, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 153 (Ala. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted for grand larceny, and for buying, receiving, concealing, etc., stolen property, (felony), was convicted for the latter offense, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of five years.

This appeal is on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions, and shows regular proceedings and judgment of conviction, finding the defendant guilty as above, following the verdict of the jury. The record also shows a sentence imposed upon the defendant, sentencing him to a term of imimprisonment in the penitentiary as provided by law. The certificate of the trial judge shows that the time for filing a bill of exceptions expired, and none has been presented or filed.

■ There is no error apparent in the record; therefore the judgment of conviction is affirmed. (

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, J.

The defendant was indicted for grand larceny, and for buying, receiving, concealing, etc., stolen property, (felony), was convicted for the latter offense, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of five years.

This appeal is on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions, and shows regular proceedings and judgment of conviction, finding the defendant guilty as above, following the verdict of the jury. The record also shows a sentence imposed upon the defendant, sentencing him to a term of imimprisonment in the penitentiary as provided by law. The certificate of the trial judge shows that the time for filing a bill of exceptions expired, and none has been presented or filed.

■ There is no error apparent in the record; therefore the judgment of conviction is affirmed. (

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 So. 143, 16 Ala. App. 469, 1918 Ala. App. LEXIS 153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullinax-v-state-alactapp-1918.