Mullinax v. Standard Fire Insurance
This text of 263 S.E.2d 231 (Mullinax v. Standard Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action for damages arising from a motor vehicle collision. Defendant Delgado answered and filed a third party complaint against the Standard Fire Insurance Company. Plaintiff Mullinax amended his complaint to include a cross claim against Standard. Later Delgado dismissed without prejudice her complaint against Standard. Whereupon, Standard made its motion to strike and dismiss plaintiffs cross claim. The appeal is from the order of the trial court which granted Standard’s motion to strike and dismiss plaintiffs cross claim. Held:
No disposition has been made of plaintiffs complaint against defendant. It therefore remains pending in the trial court. The order appealed from contains no express determination that there was no just reason for delay and express direction for the entry of final judgment pursuant to Code Ann. § 81A-154 (b) (Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 658). The action, therefore, remains pending, and the interlocutory [426]*426appeal procedure set forth in Code Ann. § 6-701 (a) 2 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18; 1975, pp. 757, 758) has not been followed. This appeal is premature. Cramer v. Parrott, 149 Ga. App. 385 (254 SE2d 504); Middleton v. State Farm Life Ins. Co., 143 Ga. App. 176 (237 SE2d 684); Walker v. Robinson, 232 Ga. 361, 362-363 (207 SE2d 6).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 S.E.2d 231, 152 Ga. App. 425, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullinax-v-standard-fire-insurance-gactapp-1979.