Mullin v. State

110 S.E. 334, 27 Ga. App. 766, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 408
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 13, 1921
Docket12896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 110 S.E. 334 (Mullin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mullin v. State, 110 S.E. 334, 27 Ga. App. 766, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 408 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. In view of the facts of the case, as disclosed by the record, the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial are without substantial merit.

2. The verdict was amply authorized by the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tucker v. State
95 S.E.2d 296 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 S.E. 334, 27 Ga. App. 766, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 408, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullin-v-state-gactapp-1921.