Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Mullin v. Mullin

Mullin v. Mullin

138 A.D.2d 980, 526 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2588
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 138 A.D.2d 980 (Mullin v. Mullin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mullin v. Mullin, 138 A.D.2d 980, 526 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2588 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Motion for poor person relief and an extension of time to perfect appeal denied. Memorandum: Appellant has failed to show that he has served the notice of motion upon the County Attorney and has failed to set forth facts so that the merit to his appeal can be ascertained (see, CPLR 1101 [a], [c]; Matter of Teeter v Reed, 57 AD2d 735). Present — Doerr, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Teeter v. Reed
57 A.D.2d 735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A.D.2d 980, 526 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullin-v-mullin-nyappdiv-1988.