Mullin v. Kelly

New York Supreme Court

Mullin v. Kelly

3 How. Pr. 12

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1846

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 How. Pr. 12 (Mullin v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mullin v. Kelly, 3 How. Pr. 12 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

Jewett, Justice.

Denied the motion without costs, on the ground that the Defendant’s attorneys had stipulated to admitthe Plaintiff’s cause of action as to all items, except the execution and delivery of the promissory note declared on, and to strike out Defendant’s notice of set-off. Had the Defendant’s stipulation been served or offered before the motion papers were served, the motion would have been denied with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jewett, Justice.

Denied the motion without costs, on the ground that the Defendant’s attorneys had stipulated to admitthe Plaintiff’s cause of action as to all items, except the execution and delivery of the promissory note declared on, and to strike out Defendant’s notice of set-off. Had the Defendant’s stipulation been served or offered before the motion papers were served, the motion would have been denied with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 How. Pr. 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullin-v-kelly-nysupct-1846.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack