Mullin v. Kelly

3 How. Pr. 12
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1846·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Jewett, Justice.

Denied the motion without costs, on the ground that the Defendant’s attorneys had stipulated to admitthe Plaintiff’s cause of action as to all items, except the execution and delivery of the promissory note declared on, and to strike out Defendant’s notice of set-off. Had the Defendant’s stipulation been served or offered before the motion papers were served, the motion would have been denied with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mullin v. Kelly, 3 How. Pr. 12 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1846).

3 How. Pr. 12 (Mullin v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dodge v. Waterbury
8 Cow. 136 (New York Supreme Court, 1828)