Mullin v. GUIDANT CORPORATION
974 A.2d 722, 292 Conn. 921
This text of 974 A.2d 722 (Mullin v. GUIDANT CORPORATION) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mullin v. GUIDANT CORPORATION, 974 A.2d 722, 292 Conn. 921 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
Leslie MULLIN et al.
v.
GUIDANT CORPORATION.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Harold J. Geragosian, New Britain, in support of the petition.
Frank H. Santoro, R. Cornelius Danaher, Jr., and Calum B. Anderson, Hartford, in opposition.
The plaintiffs' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 114 Conn.App. 279, 970 A.2d 733 (2009), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mullin v. Guidant Corp.
970 A.2d 733 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2009)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
974 A.2d 722, 292 Conn. 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullin-v-guidant-corporation-conn-2009.