Mullin v. A. Brooks Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mullin v. A. Brooks Co.

851 S.W.2d 130, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 649, 1993 WL 137755

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 4, 1993·No. No. 62403·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the findings and award made by the Administrative Law Judge pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act. The Commission’s order is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from a final award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the findings and award made by the Administrative Law Judge pursuant to the Workers’ Compensation Act. The Commission’s order is supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Mullin v. A. Brooks Co., 851 S.W.2d 130, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 649, 1993 WL 137755 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

851 S.W.2d 130 (Mullin v. A. Brooks Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.