Mullikin v. State
This text of 798 So. 2d 860 (Mullikin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jared MULLIKIN, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender; David P. Gauldin, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Alan R. Dakan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant challenges the constitutionality of subsection 775.087(2), Florida Statutes (1999) (commonly referred to as the "10/20/Life" Act). We affirm.
This court has already rejected Appellant's separation of powers argument. See Green v. State, 792 So.2d 643 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001). We also reject his Cruel and Unusual Punishment and Due Process arguments without discussion. See, e.g., State v. Cotton, 769 So.2d 345 (Fla.2000); Bloodworth v. State, 504 So.2d 495 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
MINER, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
798 So. 2d 860, 2001 WL 1356666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullikin-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.