Mulliken v. Brown
This text of 201 A.D. 860 (Mulliken v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment reversed upon the law, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the [861]*861event. The complaint sets out a cause of action for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, which is an implied covenant incident to every lease. The plaintiff also proved on the trial' that there was such a breach. The landlord by making a new agreement with the subtenant, and having the subtenant attorn to him, ousted the plaintiff from possession as effectually as he could have been ousted by the execution of a warrant. (MacGlashan v. Marvin, 185 App. Div. 157.) Blaokmar, P. J., Kelly, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 A.D. 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulliken-v-brown-nyappdiv-1922.