Mulliken v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mulliken v. Brown

201 A.D. 860

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1922·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment reversed upon the law, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the [861]*861event. The complaint sets out a cause of action for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, which is an implied covenant incident to every lease. The plaintiff also proved on the trial' that there was such a breach. The landlord by making a new agreement with the subtenant, and having the subtenant attorn to him, ousted the plaintiff from possession as effectually as he could have been ousted by the execution of a warrant. (MacGlashan v. Marvin, 185 App. Div. 157.) Blaokmar, P. J., Kelly, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed upon the law, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the [861]*861event. The complaint sets out a cause of action for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment, which is an implied covenant incident to every lease. The plaintiff also proved on the trial' that there was such a breach. The landlord by making a new agreement with the subtenant, and having the subtenant attorn to him, ousted the plaintiff from possession as effectually as he could have been ousted by the execution of a warrant. (MacGlashan v. Marvin, 185 App. Div. 157.) Blaokmar, P. J., Kelly, Jaycox, Manning and Kelby, JJ., concur.

Mulliken v. Brown, 201 A.D. 860 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

201 A.D. 860 (Mulliken v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related