Mulligan v. Wetchler
This text of 287 N.E.2d 391 (Mulligan v. Wetchler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion granted and the appeal dismissed, with costs and $10 costs of motion, upon the grounds that the Appellate Division order did not direct modification of the judgment appealed from in a substantial respect and that defendant is not aggrieved by the modification (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [iii]; and see Weinberg v. Wishweg Realty Corp., 29 N Y 2d 648; Amadeus, Inc. v. State of New York, 29 N Y 2d 634; and that the dissent is not upon a stated question of law (CPLR 5601, subd. [a], par. [i]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
287 N.E.2d 391, 30 N.Y.2d 951, 335 N.Y.S.2d 701, 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulligan-v-wetchler-ny-1972.