Mulligan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mulligan v. State

801 So. 2d 230, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17268, 2001 WL 1555746

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 7, 2001

DocketNo. 2D01-3549

StatusPublished

This text of 801 So. 2d 230 (Mulligan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mulligan v. State, 801 So. 2d 230, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17268, 2001 WL 1555746 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Barbara Faye Mulligan filed a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). [231]*231In her motion, Mulligan alleged that she was entitled to additional jail credit. We affirm the trial court’s order denying her relief without prejudice to any right Mulligan may have to raise this issue in a facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Barbara Faye Mulligan filed a motion to correct illegal sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). [231]*231In her motion, Mulligan alleged that she was entitled to additional jail credit. We affirm the trial court’s order denying her relief without prejudice to any right Mulligan may have to raise this issue in a facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

801 So. 2d 230, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 17268, 2001 WL 1555746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulligan-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.