Mulligan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mulligan v. State

688 So. 2d 984, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1531, 1997 WL 80279

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 1997·No. No. 95-02628·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

Gerard Mulligan challenges his judgment and sentence for aggravated battery. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she can find no meritorious grounds for appeal. She points out, however, that the trial court failed to enter written reasons under section 39.059(7)(d), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), for imposing adult sanctions on Mulligan. Upon a review of the record, we agree that no grounds for reversal exist. Accordingly, we affirm Mulligan’s judgment and sentence and remand to the trial court for the entry of written reasons. Mulligan need not be present.

THREADGILL, C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PATTERSON, Judge.

Gerard Mulligan challenges his judgment and sentence for aggravated battery. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she can find no meritorious grounds for appeal. She points out, however, that the trial court failed to enter written reasons under section 39.059(7)(d), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), for imposing adult sanctions on Mulligan. Upon a review of the record, we agree that no grounds for reversal exist. Accordingly, we affirm Mulligan’s judgment and sentence and remand to the trial court for the entry of written reasons. Mulligan need not be present.

THREADGILL, C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.

Mulligan v. State, 688 So. 2d 984, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1531, 1997 WL 80279 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

688 So. 2d 984 (Mulligan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related