Mulligan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mulligan v. State

688 So. 2d 984, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1531, 1997 WL 80279

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 26, 1997

DocketNo. 95-02628

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 688 So. 2d 984 (Mulligan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mulligan v. State, 688 So. 2d 984, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1531, 1997 WL 80279 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PATTERSON, Judge.

Gerard Mulligan challenges his judgment and sentence for aggravated battery. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she can find no meritorious grounds for appeal. She points out, however, that the trial court failed to enter written reasons under section 39.059(7)(d), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), for imposing adult sanctions on Mulligan. Upon a review of the record, we agree that no grounds for reversal exist. Accordingly, we affirm Mulligan’s judgment and sentence and remand to the trial court for the entry of written reasons. Mulligan need not be present.

THREADGILL, C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PATTERSON, Judge.

Gerard Mulligan challenges his judgment and sentence for aggravated battery. Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), stating that she can find no meritorious grounds for appeal. She points out, however, that the trial court failed to enter written reasons under section 39.059(7)(d), Florida Statutes (Supp.1994), for imposing adult sanctions on Mulligan. Upon a review of the record, we agree that no grounds for reversal exist. Accordingly, we affirm Mulligan’s judgment and sentence and remand to the trial court for the entry of written reasons. Mulligan need not be present.

THREADGILL, C.J., and QUINCE, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

688 So. 2d 984, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1531, 1997 WL 80279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulligan-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack