Mulligan v. Sperka

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mulligan v. Sperka

34 A.D.2d 958, 313 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4644

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 958 (Mulligan v. Sperka) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mulligan v. Sperka, 34 A.D.2d 958, 313 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 11, 1969, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements (see Nesbitt V. Nimmieh, 34 A D 2d 958). Christ, P. J., Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Munder and Rabin, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order appealed from and grant plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum in Nesbitt v. Nimmich (34 A D 2d 958). (See, also, Schwartz v. Public Administrator of County of Bronx, 24 N Y 2d 65.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated March 11, 1969, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements (see Nesbitt V. Nimmieh, 34 A D 2d 958). Christ, P. J., Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Munder and Rabin, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order appealed from and grant plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum in Nesbitt v. Nimmich (34 A D 2d 958). (See, also, Schwartz v. Public Administrator of County of Bronx, 24 N Y 2d 65.)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 958, 313 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulligan-v-sperka-nyappdiv-1970.