Mulligan v. Rausch

89 A.D.3d 811, 932 N.Y.2d 360

This text of 89 A.D.3d 811 (Mulligan v. Rausch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mulligan v. Rausch, 89 A.D.3d 811, 932 N.Y.2d 360 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

[812]*812The Supreme Court properly determined there were triable issues of fact requiring the denial of the appellants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them. Rivera, J.E, Eng, Belen and Austin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 A.D.3d 811, 932 N.Y.2d 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulligan-v-rausch-nyappdiv-2011.