Mulligan v. Hall
This text of 628 A.2d 621 (Mulligan v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff appeals from a stipulated judgment awarding him damages in a personal injury action.1 On appeal, the plaintiff asserts that the trial court improperly (1) allowed the workers’ compensation carrier to intervene and (2) forced the plaintiff to trial. We are unable to review this matter because the plaintiff cannot appeal from the stipulated judgment.
“A stipulated judgment allows the parties to avoid litigation by entering into an agreement that will settle their differences once the court renders judgment on the basis of the agreement.” Housing Authority v. Lamothe, 27 Conn. App. 755, 759, 610 A.2d 695 (1992), rev’d on other grounds, 225 Conn. 757, 627 A.2d 367 (1993); Bryan v. Reynolds, 143 Conn. 456, 460, 123 A.2d 192 (1956). The stipulated judgment is a contract between the parties “ ‘acknowledged in open court and ordered to be recorded by a court of competent jurisdiction.’ ” Housing Authority v. Lamothe, supra; Gillis v. Gillis, 214 Conn. 336, 339, 572 A.2d 323 (1990). The judgment is as binding as if it had been obtained after a trial. Housing Authority v. Lamothe, supra. It cannot be altered or set aside without the consent of all of the parties, “ ‘unless it is shown that the stipulation was obtained by fraud, accident or mistake.’ ” Gillis v. Gillis, supra, 340; Housing Authority v. Lamothe, supra.
The procedure for opening or setting aside a judgment is governed by General Statutes § 52-212a2 and [205]*205Practice Book § 326.3 If a party seeks to open or set aside a judgment, it must do so by a motion to the trial court. William G. Major Construction Co. v. DeMichely, 166 Conn. 368, 375, 349 A.2d 827 (1974). A party’s failure to file a motion to open or set aside the stipulated judgment in the trial court precludes this court from reviewing the stipulated judgment. Id.
Here, the plaintiff is attempting to appeal from a stipulated judgment. There is no showing in the record of the filing of a motion to open or set aside the judgment of the trial court. If the plaintiff had moved the trial court to open or set aside the judgment, he “could have taken an appeal had he believed that the court erred in its ruling.” Id. Since the judgment was not properly challenged in the trial court, this court is unable to afford review of this matter.
The appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
628 A.2d 621, 32 Conn. App. 203, 1993 Conn. App. LEXIS 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulligan-v-hall-connappct-1993.