Mulligan v. Beau Allen Aircraft Interiors-Beau Allen Enterprise

Supreme Court of Florida

Mulligan v. Beau Allen Aircraft Interiors-Beau Allen Enterprise

196 So. 2d 914, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3987

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 29, 1967

DocketNo. 36027

StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 2d 914 (Mulligan v. Beau Allen Aircraft Interiors-Beau Allen Enterprise) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mulligan v. Beau Allen Aircraft Interiors-Beau Allen Enterprise, 196 So. 2d 914, 1967 Fla. LEXIS 3987 (Fla. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission hearing date November 17, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that

there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The motion of petitioner for attorney’s fees in this Court is denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI