Muller v. Sulkiwskyj

169 N.W.2d 481, 17 Mich. App. 373, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1205
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided May 26, 1969·No. Docket No. 6,381·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Wayne county circuit court wherein plaintiffs’ civil action seeking to set aside a former judgment on the grounds of fraud was dismissed on the grounds of res judicata. On appeal it is contended that a separate action to set aside a former judg[374]*374ment may properly be maintained when grounded on an allegation of fraud. The appellees have filed a motion to affirm the judgment of the lower court.

The allegations in plaintiffs’ complaint, if true, support a finding of intrinsic fraud which is insufficient to set aside the former judgment. Fawcett v. Atherton (1941), 298 Mich 362. It is manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are unsubstantial and require' no argument or formal submission.

The motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muller v. Sulkiwskyj, 169 N.W.2d 481, 17 Mich. App. 373, 1969 Mich. App. LEXIS 1205 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

169 N.W.2d 481 (Muller v. Sulkiwskyj) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fawcett v. Atherton
299 N.W. 108 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1941)