Muller v. Second Avenue Railroad
16 Jones & S. 546
Opinion
The court at General Term, held: “ that the burden was on the plaintiff to prove more than a mere state of facts, which is as consistent with care as with negligence on the part of the defendant. She was bound to adduce competent proof of facts showing negligence in the defendant or its servants (Baulec v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co., 59 N. Y. 356).
Opinion by Freedman, J.; Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurred.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Muller v. Second Avenue Railroad, 16 Jones & S. 546 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).
16 Jones & S. 546 (Muller v. Second Avenue Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baulec v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.
59 N.Y. 356 (New York Court of Appeals, 1874)