Muller v. Second Avenue Railroad

16 Jones & S. 546
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedDecember 4, 1882
StatusPublished

This text of 16 Jones & S. 546 (Muller v. Second Avenue Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muller v. Second Avenue Railroad, 16 Jones & S. 546 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).

Opinion

The court at General Term, held: “ that the burden was on the plaintiff to prove more than a mere state of facts, which is as consistent with care as with negligence on the part of the defendant. She was bound to adduce competent proof of facts showing negligence in the defendant or its servants (Baulec v. N. Y. & H. R. R. Co., 59 N. Y. 356).

Opinion by Freedman, J.; Sedgwick, Ch. J., concurred.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baulec v. . New York Harlem R.R. Co.
59 N.Y. 356 (New York Court of Appeals, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Jones & S. 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muller-v-second-avenue-railroad-nysuperctnyc-1882.