Muller v. Schram

138 A. 921, 101 N.J. Eq. 792, 16 Stock. 792, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 614
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 17, 1927·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Church.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisci-i, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 15.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muller v. Schram, 138 A. 921, 101 N.J. Eq. 792, 16 Stock. 792, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 614 (N.J. 1927).

138 A. 921 (Muller v. Schram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.