Muller v. Rost

New York Supreme Court

Muller v. Rost

11 N.Y.S. 615, 33 N.Y. St. Rep. 992, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2262

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 24, 1890

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 N.Y.S. 615 (Muller v. Rost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Muller v. Rost, 11 N.Y.S. 615, 33 N.Y. St. Rep. 992, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2262 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1890).

Pincite

Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.

There are circumstances disclosed by the papers herein which might very well lead the court to impose heavy conditions to the granting of a favor, but we think that perhaps the terms were rather severe. We think that the plaintiff was entitled to costs of motion, trial fee, term fee, and disbursements of the term, and to the stipulation ordered. The order appealed from should be modified to this extent, and, as modified, affirmed without costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Brunt, P. J.

There are circumstances disclosed by the papers herein which might very well lead the court to impose heavy conditions to the granting of a favor, but we think that perhaps the terms were rather severe. We think that the plaintiff was entitled to costs of motion, trial fee, term fee, and disbursements of the term, and to the stipulation ordered. The order appealed from should be modified to this extent, and, as modified, affirmed without costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 N.Y.S. 615, 33 N.Y. St. Rep. 992, 1890 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muller-v-rost-nysupct-1890.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack