Muller v. Haas

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Muller v. Haas

114 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4912

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided April 8, 1902·Published

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Conceding that the additional prior patents introduced in evidence in this case make it necessary to restrict the patent closely to the details of cut shown in the specifications, nevertheless the first claim seems to he infringed. Whatever may be the patterns according to which defendants generally make riding habits, the particular habit produced here, when taken apart, shows so close a resemblance to the parts A and D of the patent as to warrant issue of preliminary injunction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Conceding that the additional prior patents introduced in evidence in this case make it necessary to restrict the patent closely to the details of cut shown in the specifications, nevertheless the first claim seems to he infringed. Whatever may be the patterns according to which defendants generally make riding habits, the particular habit produced here, when taken apart, shows so close a resemblance to the parts A and D of the patent as to warrant issue of preliminary injunction.

Muller v. Haas, 114 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4912 (circtsdny 1902).

Pincite

114 F. 1023 (Muller v. Haas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.