Muller v. Haas

114 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4912

This text of 114 F. 1023 (Muller v. Haas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muller v. Haas, 114 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4912 (circtsdny 1902).

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

Conceding that the additional prior patents introduced in evidence in this case make it necessary to restrict the patent closely to the details of cut shown in the specifications, nevertheless the first claim seems to he infringed. Whatever may be the patterns according to which defendants generally make riding habits, the particular habit produced here, when taken apart, shows so close a resemblance to the parts A and D of the patent as to warrant issue of preliminary injunction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 F. 1023, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muller-v-haas-circtsdny-1902.