Muller v. Farmingdale Individual Laundry Service, Inc.

279 A.D. 617, 107 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3203

This text of 279 A.D. 617 (Muller v. Farmingdale Individual Laundry Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Muller v. Farmingdale Individual Laundry Service, Inc., 279 A.D. 617, 107 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

In our opinion, plaintiff failed to prove any definite agreement as to the terms essential to the contract claimed, and accordingly failed to establish that the minds of the parties met, and that he was entitled to commissions. (Cf. Stern v. Bristol Corp., 273 App. Div. 371, affd. 298 N. Y. 766; Arnold v. Schmeidler, 144 App. Div. 420, 427.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold v. Schmeidler
144 A.D. 420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Stern v. Bristol Corp.
273 A.D. 371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Stern v. Bristol Corp.
298 N.Y. 766 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 617, 107 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muller-v-farmingdale-individual-laundry-service-inc-nyappdiv-1951.