Muller v. Farmingdale Individual Laundry Service, Inc.
279 A.D. 617, 107 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3203
Opinion
In our opinion, plaintiff failed to prove any definite agreement as to the terms essential to the contract claimed, and accordingly failed to establish that the minds of the parties met, and that he was entitled to commissions. (Cf. Stern v. Bristol Corp., 273 App. Div. 371, affd. 298 N. Y. 766; Arnold v. Schmeidler, 144 App. Div. 420, 427.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Muller v. Farmingdale Individual Laundry Service, Inc., 279 A.D. 617, 107 N.Y.S.2d 814, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).
279 A.D. 617 (Muller v. Farmingdale Individual Laundry Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arnold v. Schmeidler
144 A.D. 420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1911)
Stern v. Bristol Corp.
273 A.D. 371 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Stern v. Bristol Corp.
298 N.Y. 766 (New York Court of Appeals, 1948)