Muller, A. v. Aquatic and Fitness Center

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 8, 2016·No. 380 EAL 2015·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

ABIGAIL MULLER, : No. 380 EAL 2015 :

Petitioner :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :

: :

THE AQUATIC AND FITNESS CENTER : D/B/A AFC JENKINTOWN, AQUA HAB, : L.P. D/B/A THE AQUATIC AND FITNESS : CENTER AT JENKINTOWN, AQUA HAB, : L.P. AND KYLE DONOHUE :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.

Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this

matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Muller, A. v. Aquatic and Fitness Center, (Pa. 2016).

Muller, A. v. Aquatic and Fitness Center (Muller, A. v. Aquatic and Fitness Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.