Muller, A. v. Aquatic and Fitness Center
This text of Muller, A. v. Aquatic and Fitness Center (Muller, A. v. Aquatic and Fitness Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
ABIGAIL MULLER, : No. 380 EAL 2015 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : THE AQUATIC AND FITNESS CENTER : D/B/A AFC JENKINTOWN, AQUA HAB, : L.P. D/B/A THE AQUATIC AND FITNESS : CENTER AT JENKINTOWN, AQUA HAB, : L.P. AND KYLE DONOHUE :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 8th day of February, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is DENIED.
Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this
matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Muller, A. v. Aquatic and Fitness Center, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/muller-a-v-aquatic-and-fitness-center-pa-2016.