Mullen v. Wilkes-Barre Gas & Electric Co.

77 A. 1108, 229 Pa. 54, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 552
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 1, 1910
DocketAppeal, No. 209
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 77 A. 1108 (Mullen v. Wilkes-Barre Gas & Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mullen v. Wilkes-Barre Gas & Electric Co., 77 A. 1108, 229 Pa. 54, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 552 (Pa. 1910).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

On the main question presented by this appeal, whether danger to anyone was reasonably to be apprehended because of the condition of the defendant’s wire the case is admittedly close, but in the opinion of a majority of the court the judgment should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Head of the Superior Court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Flippo
705 A.2d 1144 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1998)
Dolata v. Ohio Edison Co.
441 N.E.2d 837 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1981)
Alabama Power Company v. Taylor
306 So. 2d 236 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1975)
Blackwell v. Alabama Power Company
152 So. 2d 670 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1963)
Brillhart v. Edison Light & Power Co.
82 A.2d 44 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Town of Clinton v. Davis
177 S.W.2d 848 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1943)
Shapiro v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
21 A.2d 26 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
Weimer Et Ux. v. Westm'd Water Co.
193 A. 665 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)
Texas General Utilities Co. v. Nixon
81 S.W.2d 250 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)
Palmer, Jr. v. Miller N. Broad S. Co.
158 A. 616 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Reynolds v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co.
21 F.2d 958 (Eighth Circuit, 1927)
Cooper v. North Coast Power Co.
245 P. 317 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1926)
Stark v. Holtzclaw
105 So. 330 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Morris v. Jefferson Electric Co.
123 A. 321 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Costanza v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.
119 A. 819 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Key West Electric Co. v. Roberts
89 So. 122 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1921)
McCaffrey Ex Rel. McCaffrey v. Concord Electric Co.
114 A. 395 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1921)
Thompson v. City of Slater
193 S.W. 971 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1917)
Snyder v. Leavenworth Light, Heat & Power Co.
157 P. 442 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1916)
Geroski v. Allegheny County Light Co.
93 A. 338 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 A. 1108, 229 Pa. 54, 1910 Pa. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullen-v-wilkes-barre-gas-electric-co-pa-1910.