Mullen v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n

Fourth Circuit

Mullen v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n

669 F. App'x 181

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 17, 2016·No. No. 16-1542·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Alexander Mullen appeals from the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mullen v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Assoc., No. 1:15-cv-02640-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gary Alexander Mullen appeals from the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mullen v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Assoc., No. 1:15-cv-02640-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Mullen v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n, 669 F. App'x 181 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

669 F. App'x 181 (Mullen v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.