Mullen v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n
This text of 669 F. App'x 181 (Mullen v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Gary Alexander Mullen appeals from the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mullen v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Assoc., No. 1:15-cv-02640-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 8, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
669 F. App'x 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullen-v-us-bank-national-assn-ca4-2016.