Mullen v. Stevens

Indiana Supreme Court

Mullen v. Stevens

15 Ind. 314, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 421

DecidedDecember 11, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Ind. 314 (Mullen v. Stevens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mullen v. Stevens, 15 Ind. 314, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 421 (Ind. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This was a suit to settle a partnership account. Issues of fact were made up, and the case was referred to a referee, who made his report. Upon the report, the Court rendered judgment.

There is no bill of exceptions in the record; and the point is directly urged by the appellee, that this Court can not review the case. By the settled practice of the Court, we can not. See Ind. Dig. pp. 188, 692, and Ind. Pr. 244.

The judgment is affirmed, with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This was a suit to settle a partnership account. Issues of fact were made up, and the case was referred to a referee, who made his report. Upon the report, the Court rendered judgment.

There is no bill of exceptions in the record; and the point is directly urged by the appellee, that this Court can not review the case. By the settled practice of the Court, we can not. See Ind. Dig. pp. 188, 692, and Ind. Pr. 244.

The judgment is affirmed, with 1 per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Ind. 314, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullen-v-stevens-ind-1860.