Mullen v. Mullen
130 A. 628, 98 N.J. Eq. 728, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 583
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Fielder.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice/ Parker, Minturn, Kalisctt, Black, Kays, JJ. 6.
For reversal — Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskirk, JJ. 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mullen v. Mullen, 130 A. 628, 98 N.J. Eq. 728, 1925 N.J. LEXIS 583 (N.J. 1925).
130 A. 628 (Mullen v. Mullen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
TURRO EX REL. TURRO v. Turro
120 A.2d 52 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Salmon v. Pittenger
193 A. 843 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)
Dill v. Dill
179 A. 370 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)
Nat., C., Lyndhurst v. Rutherford Trust Co.
157 A. 142 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1931)
Warner, Etc., Admrs. v. Keiser, Etc., Exrs.
177 N.E. 369 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1931)
In Re Koss
146 A. 471 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1929)
Page v. Afflerbach
140 A. 792 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)
Pattberg v. Gott
140 A. 795 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1928)
Grossman v. Commissioner
9 B.T.A. 643 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1927)
Wright v. Sanger
137 A. 657 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1927)