Mullen v. Jacobs
254 N.E.2d 910, 25 N.Y.2d 679, 306 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 981
This text of 254 N.E.2d 910 (Mullen v. Jacobs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mullen v. Jacobs, 254 N.E.2d 910, 25 N.Y.2d 679, 306 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 981 (N.Y. 1969).
Opinion
Motion granted and, upon re argument, the motion to dismiss denied. It appears that the order appealed from had not been entered by appellant Sinclair Refining Company but by codefendant Jacobs and, accordingly, the appeal is timely taken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
254 N.E.2d 910, 25 N.Y.2d 679, 306 N.Y.S.2d 680, 1969 N.Y. LEXIS 981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullen-v-jacobs-ny-1969.