Mullen v. . Canal Co.

20 S.E. 167, 115 N.C. 15
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 5, 1894
StatusPublished

This text of 20 S.E. 167 (Mullen v. . Canal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mullen v. . Canal Co., 20 S.E. 167, 115 N.C. 15 (N.C. 1894).

Opinion

This is a petition to rehear a case in which the opinion was filed last term, 114 N.C. 8. It does not appear that it was decided hastily, nor that any material point of fact or law, or any direct authority, was overlooked. The petition must, therefore, be dismissed. Hudson v. Jordan,110 N.C. 250, and cases cited in Clark's Code (2 Ed.), 712.

Petition dismissed.

Cited: Weisel v. Cobb, 122 N.C. 70; Hodgin v. Bank, 125 N.C. 503,511.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hodgin v. . Bank
34 S.E. 709 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)
Hudson v. . Jordan
14 S.E. 741 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1892)
Mullen v. Norfolk & Carolina Canal Co.
19 S.E. 106 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1894)
Cowan v. . Phillips
28 S.E. 961 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 S.E. 167, 115 N.C. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullen-v-canal-co-nc-1894.