Mullen v. . Canal Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Mullen v. . Canal Co.

20 S.E. 167, 115 N.C. 15

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 5, 1894·Published

Opinion

This is a petition to rehear a case in which the opinion was filed last term, 114 N.C. 8. It does not appear that it was decided hastily, nor that any material point of fact or law, or any direct authority, was overlooked. The petition must, therefore, be dismissed. Hudson v. Jordan,110 N.C. 250, and cases cited in Clark's Code (2 Ed.), 712.

Petition dismissed.

Cited: Weisel v. Cobb, 122 N.C. 70; Hodgin v. Bank, 125 N.C. 503,511.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is a petition to rehear a case in which the opinion was filed last term, 114 N.C. 8. It does not appear that it was decided hastily, nor that any material point of fact or law, or any direct authority, was overlooked. The petition must, therefore, be dismissed. Hudson v. Jordan,110 N.C. 250, and cases cited in Clark's Code (2 Ed.), 712.

Petition dismissed.

Cited: Weisel v. Cobb, 122 N.C. 70; Hodgin v. Bank, 125 N.C. 503,511.

Mullen v. . Canal Co., 20 S.E. 167, 115 N.C. 15 (N.C. 1894).

Pincite

20 S.E. 167 (Mullen v. . Canal Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related