Mullen (Michael) v. State
This text of Mullen (Michael) v. State (Mullen (Michael) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
(1987). The prior guilty plea agreement is not invalid merely because Mullen was not informed that the conviction could be used as an enhancement in the future, see id. at 274 n.2, 737 P.2d at 1164 n.2, and there was no detrimental reliance because nothing in that agreement limited the use of the conviction for enhancement purposes, see Speer v. State, 116 Nev. 677, 680, 5 P.3d 1063, 1065 (2000). We conclude that the district court did not err, and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.
Pickering Pitt tup P J.
Saitta
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge William B. Terry, Chartered Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) I947A en,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mullen (Michael) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mullen-michael-v-state-nev-2014.