Mullen (Michael) v. State

Opinion

(1987). The prior guilty plea agreement is not invalid merely because Mullen was not informed that the conviction could be used as an enhancement in the future, see id. at 274 n.2, 737 P.2d at 1164 n.2, and there was no detrimental reliance because nothing in that agreement limited the use of the conviction for enhancement purposes, see Speer v. State, 116 Nev. 677, 680, 5 P.3d 1063, 1065 (2000). We conclude that the district court did not err, and we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

Pickering

Pitt tup

P J.

Saitta

cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge William B. Terry, Chartered Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2

(0) I947A en,