Mullaly v. Holden

123 Mass. 583, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 207
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided January 16, 1878·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

A declaration on an agreement within the statute óf frauds need not allege that it was in writing. Price v. Weaver, 13 Gray, 272. The second count is therefore sufficient, and the judgment affirms the cause of action therein stated, since both counts are alleged to be for the same cause. The case may thus be rightly understood by the court, and the question of the sufficiency of the first count is immaterial. Gen. Sts. c. 129, § 34. Dryden v. Dryden, 9 Pick. 546.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mullaly v. Holden, 123 Mass. 583, 1878 Mass. LEXIS 207 (Mass. 1878).

123 Mass. 583 (Mullaly v. Holden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mayor of Cambridge v. Dean
14 N.E.2d 163 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1938)
Southwick v. Spevak
252 Mass. 354 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1925)
Small v. Foley
8 Colo. App. 435 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1896)