Mull v. State

127 S.E. 240, 33 Ga. App. 582, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 611
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 4, 1925
Docket16095
StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.E. 240 (Mull v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mull v. State, 127 S.E. 240, 33 Ga. App. 582, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 611 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

In the light of the entire charge of the court and the facts of the case, the several exceptions to the charge are without substantial merit; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworih, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 S.E. 240, 33 Ga. App. 582, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 611, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mull-v-state-gactapp-1925.