Mull v. State
127 S.E. 240, 33 Ga. App. 582, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 611
Opinion
In the light of the entire charge of the court and the facts of the case, the several exceptions to the charge are without substantial merit; the verdict was authorized by the evidence, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mull v. State, 127 S.E. 240, 33 Ga. App. 582, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 611 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).
127 S.E. 240 (Mull v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.