Mull v. N.C. Dept. of Correction
This text of Mull v. N.C. Dept. of Correction (Mull v. N.C. Dept. of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
2. Plaintiff testified that in early December 2000, around December 8, he was wrongly over medicated when he was given twice his dosage of Relafen in the morning, rather than one pill in the a.m. and one in the evening. In plaintiff's affidavit, he named members of the medical staff, including Nurse Garner.
3. In early December 2000, plaintiff had been prescribed Relafen. The greater weight of the evidence does not support his claim that he was given the wrong dosage on or about the morning of December 8, 2000.
4. Even if plaintiff was given twice the dosage of Relafen on a morning in early December 2000, the evidence fails to show that he sustained any injury.
2. Each party shall bear its own costs.
This the 14th day of October 2002.
S/______________________ LAURA KRANIFELD MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/____________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN
S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mull v. N.C. Dept. of Correction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mull-v-nc-dept-of-correction-ncworkcompcom-2002.