Mull v. N.C. Department of Correction

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedApril 5, 2001
DocketI.C. No. TA-16190
StatusPublished

This text of Mull v. N.C. Department of Correction (Mull v. N.C. Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mull v. N.C. Department of Correction, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2001).

Opinion

Upon review of the prior Order, plaintiffs Petition to Sue as Indigent, and plaintiffs T-1 Claim for Damages, the Full Commission has determined that Commissioner Ballance properly dismissed plaintiffs claim for damages and properly denied plaintiffs Petition to Sue as an Indigent.

***********
Plaintiff filed a complaint alleging injury as a result of several intentional acts committed by personnel with the Department of Correction. Injuries intentionally inflicted by employees of a State agency are not compensable under the Act. G.S. 143-291; Davis v. NorthCarolina State Hwy. Commn, 271 N.C. 405, 156 S.E.2d 685 (1967). Plaintiff has failed to allege negligence on the part of an employee or agent of the Department of Correction.

Plaintiffs claim is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and plaintiffs Petition to Sue as Indigent is hereby DENIED.

S/______________ RENE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER

S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davis v. North Carolina State Highway Commission
156 S.E.2d 685 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mull v. N.C. Department of Correction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mull-v-nc-department-of-correction-ncworkcompcom-2001.