Mull v. N.C. Department of Correction
This text of Mull v. N.C. Department of Correction (Mull v. N.C. Department of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon review of the prior Order, plaintiffs Petition to Sue as Indigent, and plaintiffs T-1 Claim for Damages, the Full Commission has determined that Commissioner Ballance properly dismissed plaintiffs claim for damages and properly denied plaintiffs Petition to Sue as an Indigent.
Plaintiffs claim is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and plaintiffs Petition to Sue as Indigent is hereby DENIED.
S/______________ RENE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/_____________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER
S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mull v. N.C. Department of Correction, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mull-v-nc-department-of-correction-ncworkcompcom-2001.