Mull v. Davis

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Mull v. Davis

329 So. 2d 827, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4451

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided March 1, 1976·No. No. 10614·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

LOTTINGER, Judge.

This is one of three suits which were consolidated with the suit entitled Standard Brands, Inc. v. Department of Highways, State of Louisiana, 329 So.2d 821 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1976). The four suits were tried together in the Trial Court, however, separate judgments were rendered. We have considered the four suits together and have given our reasons for judgment this day in suit No. 10611.

For the reasons this day rendered in Standard Brands, Inc. v. Department of Highways, State of Louisiana, supra, the judgment of the Trial Court will be affirmed, all costs of this appeal to be paid by plaintiff.

AFFIRMED.

ELLIS, J., dissents and assigns reasons and dissented from the refusal to grant a rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LOTTINGER, Judge.

This is one of three suits which were consolidated with the suit entitled Standard Brands, Inc. v. Department of Highways, State of Louisiana, 329 So.2d 821 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1976). The four suits were tried together in the Trial Court, however, separate judgments were rendered. We have considered the four suits together and have given our reasons for judgment this day in suit No. 10611.

For the reasons this day rendered in Standard Brands, Inc. v. Department of Highways, State of Louisiana, supra, the judgment of the Trial Court will be affirmed, all costs of this appeal to be paid by plaintiff.

AFFIRMED.

ELLIS, J., dissents and assigns reasons and dissented from the refusal to grant a rehearing.

Mull v. Davis, 329 So. 2d 827, 1976 La. App. LEXIS 4451 (La. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

329 So. 2d 827 (Mull v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related