Mulkey v. State

318 S.E.2d 838, 170 Ga. App. 629, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1964
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 30, 1984·No. 66302·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

Our judgment in Mulkey v. State, 167 Ga. App. 627 (307 SE2d 117) has been affirmed as to the disposition by this court of the last three enumerations of error but reversed as to the disposition of the first enumeration as well as to the judgment of this court. State v. Mulkey, 252 Ga. 201 (312 SE2d 601). Accordingly, in conformity with the mandate and opinion of the Supreme Court and for the reasons stated therein, we hold the trial court’s action in admitting the oral testimony of a scientific test conducted in a related field of science but before the crime of arson in this case was committed was not er[630] ror. There being no error of substance in this case, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Decided March 30, 1984. E. Neil Wester III, for appellant. Stephen A. Williams, District Attorney, Marcus R. Morris, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mulkey v. State, 318 S.E.2d 838, 170 Ga. App. 629, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1964 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

318 S.E.2d 838 (Mulkey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ledbetter v. Cannon
384 S.E.2d 875 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1989)