Mulkey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mulkey v. State

318 S.E.2d 838, 170 Ga. App. 629, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1964

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 30, 1984

Docket66302

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 318 S.E.2d 838 (Mulkey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mulkey v. State, 318 S.E.2d 838, 170 Ga. App. 629, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1964 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Birdsong, Judge.

Our judgment in Mulkey v. State, 167 Ga. App. 627 (307 SE2d 117) has been affirmed as to the disposition by this court of the last three enumerations of error but reversed as to the disposition of the first enumeration as well as to the judgment of this court. State v. Mulkey, 252 Ga. 201 (312 SE2d 601). Accordingly, in conformity with the mandate and opinion of the Supreme Court and for the reasons stated therein, we hold the trial court’s action in admitting the oral testimony of a scientific test conducted in a related field of science but before the crime of arson in this case was committed was not er[630]*630ror. There being no error of substance in this case, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Decided March 30, 1984. E. Neil Wester III, for appellant. Stephen A. Williams, District Attorney, Marcus R. Morris, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Birdsong, Judge.

Our judgment in Mulkey v. State, 167 Ga. App. 627 (307 SE2d 117) has been affirmed as to the disposition by this court of the last three enumerations of error but reversed as to the disposition of the first enumeration as well as to the judgment of this court. State v. Mulkey, 252 Ga. 201 (312 SE2d 601). Accordingly, in conformity with the mandate and opinion of the Supreme Court and for the reasons stated therein, we hold the trial court’s action in admitting the oral testimony of a scientific test conducted in a related field of science but before the crime of arson in this case was committed was not er[630]*630ror. There being no error of substance in this case, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Decided March 30, 1984. E. Neil Wester III, for appellant. Stephen A. Williams, District Attorney, Marcus R. Morris, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, C. J., and Shulman, P. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

318 S.E.2d 838, 170 Ga. App. 629, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulkey-v-state-gactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack