Mulis v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Mulis v. State

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 262, 1979 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 69

CourtCourt of Claims of Illinois

DecidedSeptember 7, 1979

DocketNo. 79-CC-0072

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 262 (Mulis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Claims of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mulis v. State, 33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 262, 1979 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 69 (Ill. Super. Ct. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard on the stipulation of the Respondent and the Court being fully advised in the premises find that the State of Illinois wrongfully held over the occupancy of the premises previously under lease for a three month period in May, June and July of 1978. We further find that under the law of the State of Illinois set forth in Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 80, par. 1 that the owner of lands may sue for and recover rents therefore, for a fair and reasonable satisfaction for the use and occupancy thereof in cases where the lands are held and occupied by any person without any special agreement for rent. This statute applies directly in the situation now before this Court and we find that in the absence of an agreed monthly rental, the Claimant is entitled to a reasonable rent or a satisfaction for the occupancy. We further find that the Bureau of Employment Security and the Claimant agreed to the reasonableness of $13,750.00 for the rental of the premises in question for the months of May, June and July, 1978. We find this to be reasonable rent, having been agreed to by the parties.

Claimant is therefore awarded the amount of $13,750.00.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on to be heard on the stipulation of the Respondent and the Court being fully advised in the premises find that the State of Illinois wrongfully held over the occupancy of the premises previously under lease for a three month period in May, June and July of 1978. We further find that under the law of the State of Illinois set forth in Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 80, par. 1 that the owner of lands may sue for and recover rents therefore, for a fair and reasonable satisfaction for the use and occupancy thereof in cases where the lands are held and occupied by any person without any special agreement for rent. This statute applies directly in the situation now before this Court and we find that in the absence of an agreed monthly rental, the Claimant is entitled to a reasonable rent or a satisfaction for the occupancy. We further find that the Bureau of Employment Security and the Claimant agreed to the reasonableness of $13,750.00 for the rental of the premises in question for the months of May, June and July, 1978. We find this to be reasonable rent, having been agreed to by the parties.

Claimant is therefore awarded the amount of $13,750.00.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Ill. Ct. Cl. 262, 1979 Ill. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mulis-v-state-ilclaimsct-1979.